PDA

View Full Version : A Suggestion Amongst Us


AsILayDying
06-29-2010, 03:53 PM
Are you tired of the noobs that say "nno artz click strartt" and then they have 4 arts per unit when the game is going? I have a suggestion that I think we can stop these players.

How It Works

EACH PLAYER on EACH TEAM will have a CHECK MARK and a RED X MARK on their screen. The Check Mark and the Red X Mark stands for "Do you want to play with arts?" or something like that. Each team will have an OVERALL TEAM Check Mark or a Team Red X Mark (like the level counters) depending on the vote of the team. For example, there are 5 players on my team, and 3 of them voted for No Arts "Red X Mark" & 2 of them voted Arts "Check Mark" then the overall team score would be a Red X Mark, and the players with arts will have to remove their artifacts. This will happen on EACH TEAM. If there is at least ONE TEAM that has an X Mark in the overall TEAM vote, then everyone with artifacts in their backpack will have to remove them. *You cannot click ready or start, if you have not individually voted on the CHECK MARK or the RED X MARK.

I think this suggestion could work because, 1: there will be no more threads about "LOOK NOOB HE USE ARTS IN GAME AND AGREE NOT TOO BAN PLZ". If BOTH of the team want to use the artifacts then both teams are happy and will get BOTH GREEN CHECK MARKS.

Tell me what you think. :)

AsILayDying
06-30-2010, 01:13 AM
No responses?

hoanghuynh
06-30-2010, 01:43 AM
the x and red marks is really confusing, and we can use arts whenever we want. There is no way to stop them using arts..., if they want to play fair, then there will be no arts, if they dont want to play fair, there will be arts!

AsILayDying
06-30-2010, 02:06 AM
the x and red marks is really confusing, and we can use arts whenever we want. There is no way to stop them using arts..., if they want to play fair, then there will be no arts, if they dont want to play fair, there will be arts!
This idea doesn't stop arts, it keeps the teams fair.

About the Check and the X mark thing it only looks confusing because it is hard to describe how it works. IMO, I read it out loud and it doesn't sound that confusing.

if they want to play fair, then there will be no arts, if they dont want to play fair, there will be arts!
Have you not seen the complaints about noobs bringing in arts when promised not?

11Jay
06-30-2010, 07:03 AM
Lol i had aksu aksu tmp vs a guy with magic and i still won because he make bad decisions:)

hoanghuynh
06-30-2010, 05:39 PM
Have you not seen the complaints about noobs bringing in arts when promised not? :o[/QUOTE]

well, its up to their magics users, if they have a good personality they will not use arts and be fair, if the people who dont have a good personality, they will lie :)

AsILayDying
06-30-2010, 07:25 PM
well, its up to their magics users, if they have a good personality they will not use arts and be fair, if the people who dont have a good personality, they will lie :)
This is what I was trying to stop. :)

knutistgut
06-30-2010, 07:36 PM
The problem is players want more and more play a game with some kinds of cheats. Art-using is a kind to cheat because this weapons are overpowered or the armors drop the taken damage or weight so you can use more meds or nades.

The other side is the income for the developer of this game. Arts, keys and gamble is a good way to raise the income because players invest more money to get arts or to upgrade them. I also notice a high number of user who dont use art-weapons or armors but art-ammo. So developer support art-using in differnet ways like more exp or more famepoints. And features of non using arts will never come because it would drop the main income. The developer would be a bad businessman if he think other. He must pay for server, programming, graphics and so on.

Thats sad but also a mirror of society in real life. Just look at doping in sports or different websides with cheatingtools or books for commercial games.

Reptile1977
07-04-2010, 08:47 AM
I think its about fun and good games.
But if some broke rules at least what we can do to kill his units.
so if he lied he dies if we can.
Let the battle be our judge.:=)